stand out and capture

The fashion blog Still in Berlin says that “the mustache is the new full beard“, so I thought I might experiment with growing a moustache. I’m not very fashionable – most of the time I flop around town in Birkenstock clogs and baggy cargo shorts – but I thought a moustache might give me a little trendy elan. I’m now thinking I’ll abandon this experiment.

One thing I didn’t count on is the fact that about half of my whiskers are blonde.
scumstache
This crop might show my blonde whiskers in more detail.
scumstache close
This is a little surprising since my hair is nearly black.
tighthair
As a youth, I was disappointed that my height was just short of six feet, and my hair was just short of black. My dad’s hair was black before it turned gray, but he’s only five-and-a-half feet tall. I guess I’ll take dark brown hair for 5.75 inches.

On the other hand, maybe my blond whiskers shouldn’t surprise me, since I have the weird mutant eyebrow hairs that are blond and much longer than the rest of the hairs.
mutant eyebrow
It was pretty hard to get a good shot of my eyebrows, since my camera wanted to focus on my eyes. I guess I could have gotten someone to take these shots instead of holding the camera up to my face and hoping for the best.

eyeshot
Anyway, I think I’ll lose the ’stache and return to my clean-shaven ways, but the moustache experience has been worthwhile, if only to prove that I shouldn’t try to grow facial hair.

Update 8/22: The experiment is over. I shaved the ’stache earlier this afternoon. I didn’t think it was particularly uncomfortable, but I feel much more comfortable now that it’s gone. Facial hair is just not for me.

oil essentially slide

As I mentioned at the Austin Bloggers Stammtisch last night, I’m thinking of getting a new pair of glasses. I had my eyes checked yesterday, and my prescription hasn’t changed. However, I’ve been paying for optical insurance, and the plan-year ends at the end of the month, so I reckon I might as well use my benefits to get a new pair of glasses. I like the glasses I have right now, but they’re pretty understated compared to what I usually wear, so I like to get some frames that are a little more bold. I’m not going to go to the same lengths as Prentiss, but I thought I might solicit some feedback from my readers on a new pair of frames.

As my myopic readers know, getting a new pair of glasses can be a nerve-wracking experience: you’re committing to something you’ll wear every day for the next few years. I suggested to the optician that the optometrist’s office should have digital camera on hand, so customers could post pictures on their blogs. Marita, the optician, said, “We’re not that high-tech,” but that I could come back with my camera and she’d take pictures for me. That probably would have taken less time than tracking down images of the frames online, but now that I’ve the web-work, here are the frames I’m thinking about.

  • Pro-Design Denmark 1164
    These are the frames I’m leaning toward the most, but they are the most expensive. Marita also thought they were a little wide compared to the distance between my pupils, but I thought I would look OK, if a little geeky and crosseyed. Back when I had a real job, I had a pair of expensive L.A. Eyeworks frames that were very similar to these, except they lenses were deeper and the frames were blue. I liked them a lot, so I’d kind of like to go back to that horn-rim shape.
  • Ray-Ban RX-5078
    These are the other frames I’m seriously considering, and the hardest to find online, thanks to a database problem at the Ray-Ban site. The frames they have on hand are in a reddish tortoise-shell. My current frames are gray wire, so these would have the most contrast with what I’m wearing now. One reason I’m a little hestitant to get these frames is that all of the plastic frames I’ve had in the past have broken, usually on the bridge, leading to the classic tape-on-the-nose look. I guess I’d be keeping it real if I went with these. My other reservation is that I sort of thing that the clunky plastic frame thing was over at least a decade ago, but perhaps it’s a “classic” look now.
  • Kenneth Cole Reaction KCO625
    Marita picked these out for me, but they’re the frames I’m the least enthusiastic about. They’re very similar in shape to my current glasses, but there’s no plastic on my current frames.

Anyway, Marita was very helpful, and all of these frames fit my face, but I’m having a hard time deciding on a pair, although I’m leaning toward the first frames I listed, which are only twenty bucks more expensive than the cheapest frames, the Ray-Bans.

The other issue I’m struggling with is the issue of coatings. My current glasses have an anti-glare coating, which is really nice. The problem I have with my current cheapo Wal-Mart glasses is that they’re darn-near impossible to clean thanks to the cheap anti-glare coating.

Marita wasn’t kidding when she said the office wasn’t high-tech. Rather than put the frame and coating options in a spreadsheet, she did the math on an old-school adding machine. After deciphering the feet of register tape, it seems he cheapest anti-glare coating adds fifty dollars to the cost of my glasses (after insurance and all that) and the most expensive adds nearly one hundred dollars to the cost. I called a college buddy who’s an optometrist and he recommended the most expensive coating by name, but, gosh, a hundred bucks seems like a lot of money to keep the grease off my specs. Does anyone have an opinion on frames or glare coatings?

stretching out

In navel-gazing, site-administration news, I’ve tweaked the stylesheet of this blog. The primary reason is to accomodate Flickr’s five-hundred-pixel width images without overflowing into the sidebar, but I’ve also messed around with the way comments appear. A result of this change is that the width of the page is now greater than six-hundred-forty pixels. I would be pretty surprised if anyone was reading this blog at 640×480, but I apologize in advance. I guess the infobong-approved workaround is to use WorkFriendly.

One of these days, I’m going to go through my stylesheet with the metaphorical fine-toothed comb and clean out the styles I don’t use. There is a dearth of simple themes for WordPress, and I’d like to trim this down to something someone new to WordPress could use as a reference. I based my theme off of Minim8, which on the surface appears to be rather simple, but is fillled with print design fetishes like fixed-size fonts and other things that aren’t best practices for the Web.

a few bugs in the system

Huh, I didn’t realize until I read today’s “Doonesbury” comic strip that I share the same hometown as Mike Doonesbury – Tulsa, Oklahoma. According to this FAQ, Garry Trudeau’s choice of the city had little conscious cultural significance, explaining, “The selection of Tulsa, mentioned in the strip’s debut, was the first of thousands of occasions on which the creator went with the first thing that popped into his head.” After I tracked down the first strip, I realized that I had almost certainly read the comic, but the fact that Mike was from Tulsa wouldn’t have registered, since at the time I would have been a teenager living in Tulsa. I doubt I would have put the computer humor in the context of 1970 America, either.

Tulsa’s a funny choice of hometowns for Mike because as long as I can remember (which, for newspaper comics, is the Reagan administration) the major daily in Tulsa, The Tulsa World has buried “Doonesbury” deep in the classifed section, while other, less political strips like “Mallard Fillmore” run on the comics page in section C. Readers presumably complained that the strip rotted the minds of Tulsa’s youth. I remember being quite an avid reader of newspaper comics as a youth, and, once I finished “Bloom County” on the comics page, digging through the classifieds to find “Doonesbury.” Berke Breathed’s tales of cats and penguins probably rotted my mind more than “Doonesbury,” but it’s still an interesting memory of resisting newspaper design.

take a number

I’ve complained before about my mobile phone, but I just discovered another quirk that really takes the cake. My phone just vibrated, and I immediately pulled it out of my pocket. It told me I had one new voicemail message, so I hit the “call voicemail” menu option. The nice synthetic-voice lady started talking and informed me that I had six new voice messages, and the first dates back to June 24th. I’m going through a very stressful time, so I just hung up and went back to what I was doing. But, if you’ve left me a message in, oh, the last two or three weeks, you now know why I haven’t returned your call.

links for 2006-07-03

links for 2006-06-29

links for 2006-06-27

links for 2006-06-26

links for 2006-06-17

« Previous PageNext Page »