linkdump for 2006.10.20

linkdump for 2006.10.19

linkdump for 2006.10.18

linkdump for 2006.10.16

beauty is distorted

I’ve seen a few blogs link to this formally interesting Dove soap video which uses rapid jump cuts to depict the transformation of a fairly ordinary-looking woman into a hottie billboard model. The video shows the woman sitting down at a makeup chair, then quickly-edited shots show artists doing her hair and makeup. The video then shifts to a photo-editing application where her image is further touched up, finally transitioning to the woman’s image on a billboard. The meaning of the video seems to be intentionally ambiguous. On one hand it suggests that beauty is quite literally constructed: it takes a team of hairdressers, make-up artists, and designers to make a woman into a beauty ideal. On the other hand, it suggests that all women have the potential to conform to beauty norms, if they use the right products and techniques. Like much of Dove’s “Campaign for Real Beauty” it does a dance with feminist critiques of beauty ideals and promoting a consumer product.

Writing about the Dove campaign last year, Stay Free’s Carrie McLaren said, “he only reason Dove’s campaigns have caused such fervor is because advertisers have ignored feminist critics for decades and continued to parade the same bony skeletons with such uniformity that simply using non-anorexic models is enough to cut through the clutter.” I tend to agree with Carrie; it’s difficult to see how the campaign is motivated by an interest in changing general cultural attitudes when the benefit for Dove to differentiate its brand is much more immediate. (I think also of the use of breast cancer charities in earlier “pinkwashing” marketing campaigns.) Despite the appropriation of feminist thought for advertising purposes, perhaps these ads are still useful to feminists. For example, Jill/txt says she is showing the video to her daughter. Although some people may complain about the co-optation, it’s nice to have someone shell out the budget for a nicely designed media product that reflects your politics.

…or maybe not. The video is clearly an effort at viral marketing, harnessing feminists to email the video to their friends or post it to their blogs. To the right of the video, is a link that enables viewers to “tell a friend about this film.” (The film student in me cringes at the thought of calling the grainy, compressed video a “film.”) And while there’s no buttons to bookmark the site on del.icio.us or code to cut-and-paste on MySpace, the video engages the viewer in a different way. The call-to-action is not to buy the Dove beauty bar, but to get involved in the Campaign for Real Beauty. I’m unsure if any viewers would regard the campaign as a genuine grassroots effort, but passing off branding as political action seems to only reinforce the power of advertising in our culture. Rather than engage in true community organizing, this astroturf effort takes away time to promote a product and its attending discourses.

linkdump for 2006.10.15

with itineraries and maps

Wow, Google Transit would have been really, really helpful when I lived carless in Philadelphia. It’s interesting to note the absence of New York or, for that matter, Philadelphia, Boston, and DC. Is it because these systems are too complex or does Google have to do some intellectual-property wrangling before they can add in the data for these systems? Seattle is the only one of the cities on Google Transit I’ve spent any time in, and I hardly know it well enough to see how good its recommendations are. Hopefully SEPTA and MTA will get in the system soon.

linkdump for 2006.10.12

linkdump for 2006.10.11

watch tv and have a couple brews

According to Austinist, the Alamo Village is hosting screenings of cult-favorite TV shows this semester TV season. Fans of series like “Veronica Mars,” “Battlestar Galactica,” and “The Office” can head to Anderson Lane for one of the “TV Parties1 and have beer and pizza delivered to the comfort of their seats.

Most of these events start a half-hour after the shows air, allowing the Alamo to screen them commercial-free. Not that I’m particularly invested in the continued prosperity of the corporate media, but I wonder about the legal status of these events. TV producers have long guarded their intellectual property, to the extent it’s difficult for universities to maintain libraries of historic TV programming. (DVD has changed this somewhat, but I personally prefer watching the commercials if a show is five years or older.) Alamo is making money by selling food and drinks (but not tickets) at these parties, so I could how copyright holders might object to the events. I know first-hand many bars show football games on Saturdays for the enjoyment of their patrons, but using a TiVo to redact the commercials and hosting an event takes it one step further. Does anyone know if bars pay a license fee (like an ASCAP or BMI license) to show TV? Are the rules different for theaters? I’m a little surprised the Alamo would be so bold in using a TiVo.

1. It strikes me as a little strange the Alamo would appropriate the title of Black Flag’s anti-TV classic for a series of events where patrons actually watch TV. But I’ll just hope they have a screening of “That’s Incredible” and “Hill Street Blues.”

« Previous PageNext Page »