links for 2006-03-18

links for 2006-03-17

creative commons in court

It looks like a Creative Commons case has gone into litigation &em in the Netherlands. A Dutch tabloid published some photos Adam Curry posted online under the attribution-non-commercial license, and, since the tabloid is a commercial entity, Curry took them to court. Here’s an update with a translation of the judge’s ruling.

I’ve long wondered how Creative Commons licenses would play out in court, and it appears that they’re enforceable. However, you do need the resources to engage in litigation. If a business was using my content, I doubt I’d be able to take them to court, unless someone wanted to do some pro-bono work.

geeky browser kvetching

This week, I finally got frustrated enough with Safari hanging and failing to render plug-in heavy pages that I’m using Firefox as my primary browser. One major problem I’ve encountered is that I have a difficult time accessing the admin screens for my WordPress install in Firefox. When I go to ./post.php, I am redirected to the main infobong.com page. Yesterday, I wound up cutting and pasting links from Firefox and posting in Safari. This post describes the same problem, but the fix didn’t work for me. Does anyone know the fix for OS X? I’m not having the same problem accessing the admin screens for the Semantic Web class blog.

Right now, I’m trying out Deepest Sender, a Firefox plugin that uses the RPC extensions on a variety of blog platforms.  When I was able to access my admin screens yesterday, it has a nice Ajax interface for formatting, so I would like to use Firefox to post. It’s a pity no one has an Ajaxamacated button for inserting footnotes. Deepest Sender also seems to be pretty strict about inserting HTML in its WYSIWYG window; angle brackets are converted to HTML entities, which is frustrating for someone who thinks in HTML.

Since I’m messing around with plugins, I also downloaded the del.icio.us plugin for Firefox, and I must say that the bookmarklet has more functionality. The plugin doesn’t offer users del.icio.us’ tag suggestion interface, which I appreciate when I’m quickly publishing links. OK, now that I’ve alienated all of my media-studies colleagues with geeky browser kvetching, I’ll go back to posting media links and anecdotes about coffeeshops.

links for 2006-03-16

buzz number

Chip said tonight that AustinBloggers.org would be moving to AustinBloggers 1.9. Adina asked what would be coming with 1.9. Chip said “Well it will have Ajax, but no rounded corners. If it had rounded corners,” he said, “it would be 2.0.”
It dawned on me that he was making a Web 2.0 joke, and I said, “Oh, so it’s not a rev number, it’s a buzz number!”

Has anyone used “buzz number” to describe a version number used to link a project to a trendy technology, rather than internal versions? If not, I’m claiming this as my contribution to techster jargon.

days as a young mathlete

Today I picked up a copy of Vice Magazine’s “Guide to Austin”1 and discovered that for once I’m ahead of the curve! One of the advertisments at “the front of the book” featured a photograph of a designer calculator watch. I’ve been wearing a calculator watch as a semi-ironic fashion statement for over a year, so it felt nice to see that someone thinks kids these days would think a calculator watch is cool.2 The Paul Frank calculator watch looks suspiciously like my Timex 1440, but it costs three times as much. I think my authentic Timex watch is hipper than a designer version, but the young whipper-snappers of today seem to have little regard for authenticity.

1. Although I think Vice is a truly despicable publication, I have to admit that their SXSW compilation last year was quite good and introduced me to a bunch of semi-mainstream bands that I heard a lot over the year. If you can get your hands on the sampler (I found mine in Dobie Mall) pick it up.

2. I do think people in their early 20s are too young to remember calculator watches. My students last year had never seen one before. One student asked, “Did you order that from the back of Mad Magazine?”

no particular territorial inscription

I’ve been thinking a lot about memes lately, probably because I have to give a class presentation about Mark Poster’s “Perfect Transmissions: Evil Bert Bin Laden” in a few weeks. Poster’s essay examines how the “Sesame Street” character Bert made a cameo appearance in a pro-Bin Laden poster that was widely reported by the Western media. Poster’s argument is primarily about how images and information are disseminated globally in often context-less ways that often create strange juxtapositions and produce new meanings.

My problem with the essay is two-fold. First, it treats the Bert is Evil image as a special case, rather than a fairly common online phenomenon - isn’t the Bert Bin Laden poster another case of the same phenomenon that gave rise to this Oolong the pancake bunny image or this Domo-kun image? Secondly, he doesn’t really provide an explananation for the overall phenomenon of replicating and recontextualizing images. Like the Bert Bin Laden poster, these images rely on cultural symbols that are placed into a new context, but in these cases it’s Japanese culture transmogrified into American (or at least Anglophone) Internet culture. Isn’t there a more universal process going on?

Which brings me to memes. There are even more things I don’t like about “memetics.” The theory wants to assign agency to information that I don’t think is warranted. People disseminate these ideas and images - I find it hard to believe they propagate themselves. Secondly, the theory was proposed by Richard Dawkins, a non-media specialist, and when people outside communications and media studies start theorizing about the media, reductionist folk theories start to propagate. (Noam Chomsky and, to a lesser extent, George Lakoff are examples of non-specialists making reductionist claims.) I know little about the psychological research that has followed Dawkins’ proposal of memetics, but I’d never be able to get away with claiming that “information is like a virus,” and I don’t think I would beleive it myself. I’m more interested in the social contexts of these “mash-ups” and how the symbolic power of the images persists.

I suppose the short-term solution is to use “meme” in a folky sense. Since that’s the term used online to describe artifacts like Oolong and Domo-kun, it make sense to use it. In terms of a larger research project, I imagine it’s possible to study the meme phenomenon online, while refusing to subscribe to any notion of memetics.

links for 2006-03-15

nectar of heavenly sweetness

I’m sitting along the drag on Little City’s patio. Three burly college-age white guys dressed in thug style strutted past, looking tough. I noticed one was swinging a liter bottle of San Pellegrino mineral water as if it were a 40 or perhaps a bottle of Cristal. It was clearly a prop to extend his “thug” self-presentation. Yup, mineral water, that’s hard.

« Previous PageNext Page »