cowpies and roadkill are excluded from this offer
opportunity to confuse

The new issue of Stay Free! has an interview with "Bill," who takes credit for starting the flash mob phenomenon in New York City. One the issues that he seems to want to dodge is what, if any political aspects there may to flash mobbing. When the craze hit two summers ago, I felt a little distressed that all of this organizational effort went into a purportedly apolitical project; at the time, I suggested it was a celebration of technology. "Bill" says that, while the original New York mobs were a statement on scenesterism, mobs in other cities took on a political component. For example, a mob in Minneapolis seemed to raise issues of public space.

The sensibility of the participants seemed very much to be: we're here to show all you people here in the Mall of America that we're thinking on a different plane. So it was much less of a cynical in-joke on scenesterism and much more of a genuine self-expression. The New York mob was, in a certain way, about anti-expression. It was kind of like, we're all just going to show up and we're going to chant and be a big physical presence for no reason other than we think that it's funny. Whereas in other places it took on almost a "happening" kind of vibe, to express a certain kind of commonality, and to express, say, a certain opposition to corporate space. It was taken up almost entirely in a politically tinged way, even though it was never explicitly political.

Certainly there are other, more overt, ways to recuperate public space such as Reclaim the Streets! or the Berlin Love Parade, but "Bill" suggests that overtly political messages might have turned off many participants.

Posted by McChris at May 11, 2005 05:39 PM
| TrackBack
Comments
Post a comment









Remember personal info?