One of the issues we're exploring in my "Media/History/Collective Memory" class is nostalgia. We're looking at how it can be invoked for political purposes (generally on the right) or as a marketing tool. The New York Times has a story today about how many eighties bands are retooling, but having a hard time marketing themselves. Apparently, my generation doesn't idealize the 1980s the way that Baby Boomers romanticized the 1960s.
Certainly the cultural conditions of the 1980s were different from those of the 1960s, making it more difficult for folks my age to feel nostalgic about the Reagan era, but I also wonder if there were institutional conditions within the music industry that also generated products with a short shelf-life. For example, in the 1960s FM radio was still a frontier for commercial broadcasting - for much of the decade FM transmitters were largely used to simulcast AM programming. In the late 60s, FM radio was accessible to low-paid DJs who could introduce the public to favorite records and enjoyed a great deal of latitude over their broadcast. In contrast, FM listeners overtook AM listeners in the early 80s, and by then had become an important outlet for record labels to promote bands. It had become another arm of an increasingly corporatized music industry.
I'm on the tail of Generation X, and I enjoyed a lot of eighties music in high school: bands like Talking Heads and New Order were old bands from a different era. Still, I'd have a hard time enjoying more commericial bands from the early eighties. I sometimes listen to a retro hour on a local radio station, and I'm dismayed when they'll play a song that was released when I was in high school or - even worse - in college. I'll think, "Pavement isn't retro... yet." But I suppose, for the purposes of radio programming, anything that is off the rotation and the listeners want to hear is "retro.
A couple of thoughts:
With the ubiquity of oldies formats and micro-formats, I'm not sure the eighties ever went away in the sense that the sixties did. It's hard to revive something that never went out of sight long enough to be forgotten.
And I wonder how you feel about the Gen X label (and I suppose about generational labels in general). I'm told that as the demographers look at such things I'm at the tail end of the Boomers but I always felt like I fell into a gap between mass-media-identified generations: too young to have participated in 60's youth culture or faced the draft, but too old to think of those things as irrelevant ancient history.
Once the Gen X label was in wide circulation, it didn't take long for people to decide it had peaked and we were now in Generation Y or Z. I could never even keep track of what the generation-mongers thought the generations were supposed to be, let alone correlate them with reality. Has the terminology settled down by now?
Posted by: Prentiss Riddle at February 15, 2005 08:55 PMrecent entries
internet to zone out
internet to zone out
sticky situation and paperwork
just deserts
heap of burnt orange
update
wing in the happy house
rushing out of frame
not really that powerful
intertextual gaffe
about infobong.com
archives
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
topics