cowpies and roadkill are excluded from this offer
provenance was preserved

I wanted to blog this a few days ago when Salon.com published an excessively snarky item about the Harry Ransom Center's acquisition of Don Dillo's papers. Not mentioning the papers would be housed at HRC, or the University of Texas, or even Austin, Scott Thill wrote:

...finally, the archive of Don DeLillo, the brilliant author behind the canonical "White Noise," "End Zone" and many more, has finally found a home.

The bad news? It's in Texas.

... an author who was born, raised, employed and housed in New York for decades now has had his personal papers shipped thousands of miles away to a state that could stand to learn more than a few lessons from his work.

I personally know the person responsible for cataloging DeLillo's papers at HRC, and wondered how Kati would react to this portrayal. I understand the coastal humor, but not acknowledging that the papers would be housed at one of the largest and more prestigious campuses in the country was disingenuous and misleading to readers unaware of the archive's acquisition.

Today, I was happy to see Salon published a letter from Kati, taking issue with the story's portrayal of Texas. So you don't have to go through Salon's Clockwork Orange-style ad system, I've pasted in her letter below. (Kati, I know you read this site from time to time, so let me know if you have a problem with this.) Hooray for Kati!

The Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center (HRC), home of Don DeLillo's papers, was begun as a "center of cultural compass, a research center to be the Bibliothèque Nationale of the only state that started out as an independent nation," by Harry Huntt Ransom in 1957. Since then, the University of Texas and a plethora of private donors have worked to ensure that a highly trained staff of archivists, preservationists and librarians are able to preserve and exhibit some of the nation's greatest art and literary treasures.

As the archivist who processed and arranged DeLillo's papers it saddens me to see that you have used your column to obliterate the difference between those who treasure the lessons of history through art and literature and those who may wreak havoc on our culture. I spent several months of my working life engrossed in DeLillo's writings and personal correspondence. It was my job, duty and pleasure to ensure that the body of work he entrusted to the University of Texas was processed and arranged in such a way that its provenance was preserved. Thus, scholars for generations forth will be able to learn from the primary sources of a great man who has spent his life crafting stories to illuminate his vision of our world and her people.

It is true that DeLillo is a New Yorker, but a New York institution did not come forward to house his papers. A Texas institution recognized his influence on American culture and cared enough to step up, purchase his papers, and provide a permanent and safe home for this important collection. I understand (and share) your disgust regarding Bush's reelection, but to use that as a catalyst to degrade the fact that a Texas institution received Don DeLillo's archive is a sophomoric jab. To conflate the whole of the state of Texas with George W. Bush demonstrates, at best, intellectual dishonesty and basic ignorance. At worst, it shows exactly the kind of closed-mindedness that you believe makes Austin a city less worthy to house DeLillo's collection than New York, Yonkers, or Newark. Beware that provincialism comes with more faces than those shown in the South or in supposed "red states." Not everyone in Texas is benighted and toothless, and the stereotypical resident of Crawford is not representative of the state. In fact, even Crawford has a few residents who see beyond the media shine of their pseudo-hometown boy.

Here are the Web sites to the HRC and the Web page outlining its history.

If you have not seen it, the finding aid for DeLillo's collection may also be found here.

The finding aid is an interesting document to read, at least for those of us who find literary archives, regardless of location, to be fascinating capsules of history. Other notable collection finding aids that are available online include those for Ernest Hemingway, E.E. Cummings, Virginia Woolf, and James Joyce.

If you ever make it to Austin I would be happy to show you around and perhaps open your mind to the idea that there can be goodness, beauty and culture (sometimes even in the variety of hipper-than-hip cool) in Texas.

-- Katherine Pelletier

Posted by McChris at December 2, 2004 08:11 PM
| TrackBack
Comments

Glad I found this post. Please thank your pal for her incisive note to Salon. As a Texan, my despair over the election has only been hightened by the idiotic "red state" sniping and stereotyping in the blogosphere. I fear that this kind of crap only worsens the situation. It can only result the map going redder. My favorite stat for these people is that Kerry recieved more votes in TX than in Illinois or Massachusetts. Yeah, I know the population differences etc., but still...

Now if Austinites would only quit acting exactly the same way toward the rest of the state. Like say, Dallas. Bush won Dallas County by less than a point and a half. I can't find the numbers, but this almost certainly means that he lost the city itself. BTW, we have a new Democratic, lesbian, hispanic sheriff here...

Posted by: Steve at December 3, 2004 10:37 AM

Steve, I am glad you commented on the fact that people from Austin can be snide towards those of other Texas cities. There is a tendency towards a "hipper-than-cool" attitude in this town that often makes me uncomfortable. I believe this attitude can create a chasm between the "liberal oasis" that Austin sees itself as and understanding that those who live in other Texas cities might actually share similar values.

I do hope that this election will, in the long run, teach people to come together and continue to work toward change and simply not give up for losing "the big one." If we can continue to grind through the local offices, making changes at the local level, it will expand into the higher offices of the land.

As for the "new Democratic, lesbian, hispanic sheriff here," is "here" Dallas County? If so that is great. What a wonderful thing to see a person placed in office, I hope, for their integrity and abilities and not their sexual orientation or race.

Posted by: Kati at December 3, 2004 12:02 PM

> is "here" Dallas County?
Believe it or not, yes:

washingtonpost.com
Democrats Gaining a Foothold in Texas
Increasing Hispanic Population Is Credited With Diversifying Winners of Local Races

By Sylvia Moreno
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 10, 2004; Page A03

DALLAS, Nov. 9 -- Lupe Valdez is a woman, a Hispanic, a Democrat and a lesbian -- and, come Jan. 1, she's entering the ranks of Texas good ol' boys. Valdez is becoming Sheriff Lupe.

Any one description -- female, Latina, Democrat and openly gay -- would have qualified Valdez's election as Dallas County sheriff for the local history books. But all four?

"Who would've ever imagined . . .?" editorialized the Dallas Morning News, which endorsed Valdez. Valdez, who faced three opponents in a March Democratic primary and then advanced to an April runoff, last week edged out Republican Danny Chandler, a 30-year veteran of the Sheriff's Department.

Valdez won 51 percent of the vote, overcoming the opposition of the unions that represent the 1,785 employees in the Sheriff's Department and an eleventh-hour alarm sounded by Chandler and the conservative Texas Eagle Forum about her acceptance of campaign contributions from the Washington-based Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund.

"It has not that much to do with me," Valdez, 57, a retired federal law enforcement officer, said as she sat in her modest campaign office in Dallas's largely Hispanic Oak Cliff neighborhood. The former migrant farm worker, who picked green beans and beets as a child and went on to a career in the military and federal government, and who recently earned a master's degree in criminology, lives in the neighborhood, with its multitude of bungalows, taquerias and Latino-owned auto body shops.

"It speaks very well of Dallas County, for them to be comfortable in looking at my credentials and feeling comfortable that I could do the job," she said. "What does female, what does Hispanic, what does any of this have to do with this? What is important is your experience, your ability and your willingness to do the job."

It speaks also of a political trend in one of Texas's largest urban counties: a growing Democratic and Latino electorate. In one of the most Republican states four years ago and this presidential election, President Bush's margin of victory was relatively small in Dallas County. In 2000 an unknown, underfinanced Democratic candidate for district judge lost by less than a percentage point, and in 2002 two female Hispanic Democratic candidates for district judge fell just short of winning. Then, last week, more than 600,000 voters turned out, electing Dallas County's first Hispanic district judge and its first Hispanic sheriff, both Democrats and both women.

"Dallas has been viewed as the beachhead, where we start turning the state back Democratic," said Susan Hays, chairwoman of the Dallas County Democratic Party.

Valdez's election, along with that of 40 openly gay or lesbian candidates nationwide, is also viewed as "huge," said an official of the Victory Fund. The political action committee was created in 1991 to work on increasing the number of openly gay public officials at all levels.

In an election in which 11 states passed proposals barring same-sex marriage, the candidates' wins prove that "when you have an openly gay candidate that people get to meet, get to share views with, voters are very open," said Robin Brand, vice president of campaigns and elections for the Victory Fund. "Lupe won because of her credentials. She has a background that made her very attractive, and she had a great message about bringing change to the sheriff's office."

Headed by the same sheriff for 20 years, the Dallas County Sheriff's Department was rocked recently by allegations of cronyism and corruption. Sheriff Jim Bowles, a Republican, was indicted earlier this year after an investigation into the county jail's commissary contract. The indictment was dismissed, and Bowles ran in the Republican primary to try to keep his job, but he lost to Chandler.

Valdez said she decided to run for sheriff to restore integrity and trust to the department. Prohibited from running for a partisan office while a federal employee, she took early retirement in January from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, where she worked as a criminal investigator and undercover officer in the Immigration and Customs Enforcement division. She worked 23 of her 28 years in law enforcement as a federal agent for the General Services Administration, the Department of Agriculture and U.S. customs, before and after it was incorporated into Homeland Security.

"What have we come to when we can't say 'elected official' in the same sentence as 'interest of the people' or 'honesty' or 'trust'?" Valdez asked.

Referring to other recent scandals that affected local law enforcement agencies, she said: "In all areas you looked at in Dallas County, the badge was tainted. But I know that most of those people are good people who work hard. We can bring integrity back into the department and run it like it should be: to serve and protect the public."

Her Republican opponent, who worked in the Sheriff's Department for three decades, then left to take over Dallas County's office of security and emergency management, also campaigned on a platform promoting systemic change. The race was fairly cordial until five days before the election, when Chandler sent out a mass mailing criticizing Valdez's acceptance of a Victory Fund endorsement and money. He was joined by the Texas Eagle Forum, saying it would be inappropriate for a sheriff to advocate for Victory Fund platforms on issues such as same-sex marriage and federal gay and lesbian civil rights legislation.

Valdez responded by calling the attack a "desperate" move.

Now focused on assembling a transition team, Valdez is preparing to take over a department with a $90 million budget whose primary function is to run six county jails and supervise 7,000 inmates. She will be the only female sheriff of Texas's 254 when she is sworn in Jan. 1. Her role as an advocate in the future, she said, will be focused on "crime prevention and safety issues or inmate issues or better pay for the employees."

Posted by: Steve at December 3, 2004 12:35 PM

A good reply to a coastal bigot, I definitely believe in the professionalism of the HRC, and New York isn't exactly the other side of the earth from Austin.

And yet: I do find it plausible that the HRC has sometimes gone too far in bidding up the price of items for its collection and moving them far away from where they would be of the most benefit to scholars. You don't have to be a cheese-eating surrender monkey to think that in a rational world, any unique materials in the HRC's French collection, for example, would still be in France.

Posted by: Prentiss Riddle at December 5, 2004 01:40 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?