The New York Times has a story about what it terms "street art," the illicit application of wheatpaste posters and painted murals in public spaces. The story mention " a curatorial Web site for street art around the world," The Wooster Collective. I tracked it down after reading the story, and I'm like, "Oh Yeah!" All my synapses are firing at once looking at the images of physical urban space used in meaning-making. And they even have an RSS feed!
BTW, I really dig this picture, which I ran across a few weeks back when I was working at a 3D animation camp. I had it up on screen of a computer near the door. A young student walked in, and shouted, "Ew!" like it scared him or something. I went back and looked at the pictures on the Wooster Collective, and I think part of the reasons the images seem so arresting is that many of the shots are pretty contrasty and don't have a lot of depth-of-field (well, they're taking pictures of walls, duh). Combined with the two layers of the image, the street art and its context, the viewer has a lot of information to process in order to make sense of it.
recent entries
internet to zone out
internet to zone out
sticky situation and paperwork
just deserts
heap of burnt orange
update
wing in the happy house
rushing out of frame
not really that powerful
intertextual gaffe
about infobong.com
archives
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
topics